There’s a pattern I’ve noticed across three decades in professional associations, industry bodies, special interest communities and large organisations. It happens like clockwork every five years when a new leadership takes over.
The cycle always starts the same way. A fresh team arrives with big plans and creates a brand new community platform. Maybe it’s a community hub website, a Zoho Connect group, or the latest collaboration app. They send enthusiastic messages asking us to fill out our profiles again. Name, photo, contact details, social media links. The promise is always compelling: “We have so much value to offer, but we need your latest information to connect you better with fellow members.”
In my thirty years of dutifully entering my details into these platforms. The outcome rarely changes. Radio silence. In meetings and calls, I have never heard a fellow member say, “I found you through our new portal.”
The research backs this experience. Ninety percent of enterprise social initiatives fail despite significant investment. Major platforms like Yammer, Google+ for Business, and countless custom community hubs follow the same trajectory. They launch with excitement, see minimal engagement, then quietly fade away while everyone goes back to email, WhatsApp groups, or simple Slack channels. Only 10–20 per cent of employees engage after launch and I suppose it will be worse for industry associations or special interest groups.
What actually works? The boring stuff. Focused email groups (or WhatsApp groups) for specific topics. Small Slack (or Microsoft Teams) channels with clear purposes. Direct phone calls. These don’t have fancy features, but they solve real communication problems without adding complexity to our already busy lives.
I think we keep repeating this cycle because we’re trying to solve cultural challenges with technology solutions. New leadership wants to make their mark with modern platforms, but they often skip the harder work of understanding how people actually prefer to communicate.
The irony is that while associations and organisations invest in sophisticated community platforms, members consistently choose the simplest tools that integrate naturally into their workflows. When a tool integrates naturally into daily work, people use it; when it demands yet another profile and login, they drift away. We don’t need another social network. We need better ways to find the right person when we have a question.
Have you experienced this pattern in your professional communities? I’m genuinely curious if others have found these internal platforms genuinely useful, or if you’ve seen the same cycle of enthusiasm followed by digital ghost towns.
#CommunityBuilding #DigitalLessons #WorkplaceCommunication #Associations
Discover more from Mangoidiots
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

